paint it green

… and be done with it.

Green solutions and technology may be green, but too much of it most definitely is anything but green except maybe for the color of money. More often than not: “the greener and more polished the presentation, the worse the damage that follows”.

That is because most of what is presented is not in the least about sustainability or serving life on Earth, but rather about which “green”1 slogans and deceptions that will result in most profit to those who invest money in them.

They may as well admit that… it is all about the money … and skip all the green lies.

Warren Buffet: “We get a tax credit if we build a lot of wind farms. That's the only reason to build them. They don't make sense without the tax credit.”
So, at least not all try to hide their reasoning for building destructive elements in nature behind green excuses. What they do still do not make any sense whatsoever, but at least they let us know in no uncertain terms why they are doing it. Refreshing in a world full of lies and hidden agendas, even if those who speak the truth openly are very few and far between.

A strange confrontation is going on these days, with mindful environmentalists with hearts on one side, and heartless “greens” with more money and greed than functioning minds on the other.
I am no prophet and cannot foresee the outcome, but in its extremes it may either end up with a lush, green Earth full of beings enjoying life, or as an emptied and bare Earth with beings fearing life itself.

green insanity

Must be great to be “green” and call for elimination of the manmade (anthropogenic) part of an invisible trace-gas – CO₂ (which is less than 3.5% of the about 0.042% (420ppm) total share of CO₂ in the air right now) – on the grounds that the increasing CO₂ level causes global temperature to rise “to levels never before experienced in all of human history”2 according to the most hysterically funny (and most dangerous) “green” pretenders.

Great tactics, since few in the public can check any of it themselves, and consequently can be lead to believe just about anything – which some apparently are. 3
Must be like “having God in a bottle”, or something similarly intoxicating…

image text:
PRIMITIVE CULTURES ONCE BELIEVED THEY WERE SOMEHOW RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CHANGING CLIMATE.
I'M GLAD FOLKS DON'T BELIEVE THAT SORT OF NONSENSE ANYMORE.

It must also be noted that, as pictures of smog in cities or water-vapor and soot-particles from chimneys and tailpipes, most often are used to illustrate what they wrongly call “CO₂ pollution”, something must be seriously wrong in perception of the air that surrounds us. Either ignorance about what CO₂ really is runs deep in “green” circles, or they are deliberately trying to spread confusion and/or convince others that “We alone have seen the almighty CO₂ in action”.

Conclusion… “Progress” is a relative term.

Good thing our Earth has more than enough CO₂ stored away (mainly in the sea4) from pre-historic times, to make all attempts promoted by “greens” to “clean” the air of this life-giving trace-gas futile, albeit costly. Even better that a large part of the Earth's population simply do not buy into the hysteria behind the destructive “green” policies.

No guarantee that all critics have a much better grasp of reality than the climate hysterics though, as being right about one issue does not ensure one is right about everything else in life.5 Chances are though, that people with experience and a more holistic and positive wiew on life on Earth, may be better at seeing through and avoid the worst and most costly “green solutions” traps set before them. 6 7

Utilizing CO₂ as the irreplaceable energy-source it is, would make more sense than anything the “greens” have, and can, come up with. It is also the most cost-effective direction available to mankind. For the uninformed: that is what nature has been doing all along. So, the sensible ting to do is to let nature continue its good work without “green” or other interference, and harvest the power of naturally sustained green growth.

more green insanity

Throwing the ongoing Corona virus COVID19 disaster in with the UN Agenda 2030, does of course look like the “ideal green-painted policy”8 to global investors. “The perfect storm” in a manner of speaking, that even the roman pope seems to have jumped in on.
The latter disease is of course a lot worse for humanity than the former, no matter how one looks at it. And what the roman pope utters about any of it, does not serve to lessen the insanity.

Creating situations they can pretend to raise above and provide solutions for and salvation from, is like wet dreams to “greens” – and certain other “movements” 9 10. And that they care about survival of anyone but themselves, is wishful thinking most of these beings, by design it seems, do not share in.

Regardless of how bad the act of “reducing life and death to pure statistics” sounds, surviving the Corona virus by itself looks statistically fair. Although too many will suffer and too many will die from the Corona virus COVID19 disease, most affected humans will survive.
However, whether or not humanity will survive the other, politically planned, disaster known as Agenda 2030, is another question entirely.

Remember that question…

green movements in action…

Want something, anything, destroyed without mind or mercy: support any of the more radical green movements. No accident green is the color most often used for military uniforms, as many “green” movements are at least as destructive as military armies. 11
Excellent partners for businesses that want a layer of green over their agendas without having to change or improve on anything. The perfect recipe for making greater profits, in a world that is already overflowing with fakes of all shapes and sizes.

Green movements may also come cloaked in various shades of religiosity. Which variant(s) each movement favors isn't always clear, but clarity in such matters is often deliberately not prioritized, as it may need to be changed and/or adjusted to whatever variant the individual movement thinks it needs up front to match what it sees as its main counterpart(s) at any given time.

Chances are that “green” movements – like any other types of movements – will “change color” over time as focus move from area to area and case to case, and also when dominant figures within these movements feel the need to raise flags and put their personal marks on achievements.

Rarely ever do green movements stay recognisable in anything but names for very long. It is all about having the right profile and marketing strategy.
That is; unless they are very small, very focused, or (in very rare cases) really green and really, really concerned about the environment.

One can not write about green movements without recognizing that genuine green movements really do exist, although they are in a very clear minority compared to all those movements that run around calling themselves “green” while making funny and unsolicited noises. Chances are one will only find these genuine greens working their causes on the ground though, as rarely ever do they show up across media since they aren't about monetary profit.

sustain and recycle life…

Personally I am not the least ashamed of any of the things the (not genuine) greens want us common people to feel bad and/or ashamed over being involved in these days. Nearly all they go on about is genuine BS not founded in reality or sane thinking – green or otherwise, so one may as well ignore all that comes from them.
I am however often feeling really ashamed of being of the same race as those BS'ers, and that is a feeling that is becoming more and more difficult to shake off as more and more of the green paint (or rather green mud) those people apparently like to bade in, gets worn off to reveal hollowness and various degrees of unethical12 and/or criminal activity – or simply plain ignorance when it comes to their followers.

Life can be really good, and to me it is. No doubt it would be so much better for all without all the green-tainted sludge everywhere though.
I am all for genuine greens and their work, which I support as much as possible. The green-painted movements and their many propaganda channels however, can (quite literally) go to hell for all I care.

Sometimes I like to be all alone with nature for a while, and simply forget that any of the rest even exists. Then I can go back well rested in body and soul, and continue where I left off.
There is still so much that needs to be done in the world, for the good of mankind and all other beings and all that. And, (for whatever reason) I am not quite dead yet … sorry about that “greens”.

Stay safe, and never stop using common sense…

sincerely georg; sign

Hageland 25.apr.2020
last rev: 29.may.2020

side notes.

don't look to Norway

Although only an “artist's impression”; the image above is a good illustration of how to turn beautiful, inviting and soul-healing nature into an industrial garbage heap. In a decade or two all those embedded artifacts will have to be replaced with loads of broken down wind turbine structures and residue of their non-recyclable glassfiber-composite blades spread all over the place and/or dug under, in order to reflect reality.

Unlike our hydropower stations, that already cover all our national needs for electric energy with some to spare, and have made Norway the cleanest electric energy producer in the world, there is nothing sustainable about wind turbines13.

Each (wrongly named) “windpark” will at most provide 15 to 25 years of unreliable operation before it has to be totally rebuilt or decommissioned, and in the end a new iceage is needed to “repair” the nature. Systematised madness promoted under the cover of providing “green energy”.

We had Quisling, and there has been no lack of followers to that WW2 traitor in Norway in later years. The “modern details” embedded in the old paintingi shown above, illustrate well one way these new corrupt followers keep on serving the same old occupation forces on Norwegian soil, albeit under different flags than back in 1940 – 45.

They are blasting spaces for roads back and forth through the rough Norwegian terrain, for transport of large structures and materials to where they hope “the right amounts” of wind – not too weak and not too strong, and not too unstable, can be expected…14 … and much of this destruction is done by/for Germany and their failed “Energiwende”. 15 “Sieg Heil” indeed.

What the Germans and other power-hungry invaders really get, is access to the reliable power from our hydropower stations to compensate for some of their own shortcomings, as nearly all electric power sources in Norway are connected to the same distribution networks, and can be transferred via cables across the seabed to, and from, the European mainland.

What we Norwegians get, is the cost of building and running it all, and cleaning up once the wind turbines up and down our country have broken down and are left as “no longer profitable” garbage.
We do of course also get electric energy produced by coal-fired powerstations in Germany into our networks, when they choose to balance those transfer cables across the sea “in reverse” to offload some of the overproduction from German windfarms in high wind, and to increase profits to international energy traders.
So much for “green energy” in the Norwegian countryside, thanks to the corrupt national traitors – politicians and business people – who have laid the ground for the swindle.

don't come to Norway

The “land of wind turbines and dead birds”16, is no longer welcoming visitors like it used to. Unless you love signs of senseless destruction17 (as described higher up) all along our coast and in our mountains, Norway is not a destination you would choose.

Better go watch one of those “Nordic Nature documentary” series found as reruns on various TV channels from time to time. There you won't see, or hear, the destruction we Norwegians have to live with … also after the Corona virus COVID19 disaster tapers off.

various angles…

additional info…

the green dream … or nightmare? One may feel sorry for the “greens” and their “superior” plans, but, I'm afraid they will run out of green paint (or sludge) long before all life on their flat and uniform, but oh so desolate, Earth is choked off and dropped over the edge.

Not much will grow in an environment as low on CO₂ as some of the “greens” suggest, so they better hurry with the paint-job before too many of them are dead of hunger. Survivors may be forced to live in large, man-made, greenhouses with artificially raised CO₂ levels … the entire climate insanity in reverse to righten the grave errors made by the “greens” and related money-gobblers 18 19