milking a hypothesis
… and destroying our earth.
Three things control our world more than anything else: greed, stupidity and fear. Neither of them have any positive effects on the earth's climate, but they sure cause more than their fair share of damage to our environment.
One of the most stubborn climate change related hypothesises is that rising CO2 levels in our atmosphere caused solely by human activities, will trigger irreversible processes that will cause temperatures to rise to dangerous levels on a global scale, and lead to increases in all kinds of world-wide natural and unnatural disasters.
Climate is changing‥!
Right, thank your god for that, and quit stirring up hysteria about it.
Now, CO2 has never shown signs, or been proven, to have much of an effect on atmospheric temperatures. Rather the other way round; that temperature affects CO2 conversion to and from the atmosphere, with the Earth's oceans as the main “conversion partner”. Human activity is also only responsible for a very small percentage of the observed rises in CO2 levels in the atmosphere no matter which way it is calculated, but that minor fact is (intentionally?) overlooked by most s.c. “climate change experts”. Consequently(?), there has to be something seriously wrong with nature since it stubbornly refuses to cooperate and line up its behavior with the carefully crafted computer models. The “climate experts” can of course not be wrong, so nature must be… That reaching somewhat higher atmospheric CO2 levels is the single most important factor for achieving increased greening of our planet and improved growt of the plant-based food we and all other beings on Earth depends on, is another “minor detail” that seems to be totally ignored by the before mentioned “experts”. Death to nature no matter the cost, seems to be the mantra for these fact-suppressing ignorants.
The general hysteria caused by the flawed but widespread climate change hypothesises, resembles
religious sectarianism, and seems to have totally taken over for sanity and actual fact-checking in
surprisingly large sections of our world's leaderships and public.
The common view seems to be that “ why bother with facts when we can put all our faith, and everyone else's money, in untested and mainly untestable hypothesises and computer models‽ ”
This artificially created “crisis” and the unwarranted hysteria rising from it, is of course a great excuse for destroying environments, draining budgets, and raising taxes, and politicians, business people, and other greedy creatures, are all in and really going for it at full steam.
how to destroy the world, and getting paid for it…
Dream up, or adopt, a whole bunch of global crisis situations caused by an unverifiable fiction,
and present yourself and your disciples as saviors.
Kill off, literally or virtually, those who call out the dream/nightmare for what it is, and scare off all others who may question or criticize any part of it or show signs of disrespect for any of the “true believers”. It has worked before – check world history, and it will work again, and again, and again, generation after generation.
Make sure not to let any chance to insert connections to the dreamed-up crisis into news-stories about whatever happens
anywhere in the world, pass unused. Hammer these connections in via all available channels, all the time, as everyone
must be constantly reminded that it is a sin to think for themself and risk losing focus on the only true faith.
Whatever goes wrong is of course always someone else's fault, and such incidents must not be allowed to slow down the money-streams, or lower the feel-good factor among the faithful.
Image with text:
0.3% consensus, not 97.1%
'Scientific consensus that human activity is very likely causing most of the current GW (anthropogenic global warming, or AGW).'
11944 ABSTRACTS REVIEWED Cook et al.(2013)
7931 were excluded for expressing no opinion 66.4%
3896 marked as agreeing we cause some warming 32.6%
64 marked as endorsing consensus as defined 0.5%
41 actually consensus as defined 0.3%
0 marked as endorsing manmade catastrophe 0.0%
Consensus is a wonderful thing, and seemingly very easy to construct out of thin air and some
inventive mathematic jumble whenever needed.
No wonder the numbers behind the s.c. “scientific consensus” are among those “minor details” that can not be disputed. They are after all nothing but convenient lies, that, when repeated over and over and over again enough times, are being accepted as truth by large sections of the public, and are used as covers for all kinds of madness and destruction by those responsible for same lies.
The s.c. “consensus” is of course not a scientific construction at all, but rather an entirely political one. Anything goes in those circles, and those who won't accept it must be silenced by any means in order to uphold the illusions until there is no turning back to sane behavior no matter the outcome.
conspiratory? hell yeah!
Statistically about 10% of all humans simply lack the ability to distinguish between right and wrong. A pity that kind of not very trustworthy people are over-represented in all kinds of leading positions in our societies, in addition to controlling the world of crimes. Finding the same people on both sides of the law, is not uncommon.
One reason these creatures are allowed to dominate, may be that statistically about 80% of us prefer to stay calm and quiet, leave decisions to those who present themselves as leaders, and just accept whatever comes – at least for a while. There will always be limits to how much madness the common man and woman will accept, regardless of how many impressive words and slick lies the mainly self-appointed leading figures wrap their irrational and destructive plans in.
When people finally wake up and start pushing back against the rascals, the gloves come off and uniformed and
non-uniformed enforcers are sent in to keep the public back and the paid destruction going.
Whatever respect people may have had for them before, will disappear, and who knows if they'll ever get any of it back, or if they even care about such matters.
Such processes are great for those who want to deal with societies that are already well and truly ripped apart and are easy to divide further and destroy. For everyone else, well … we do at least get to know who we most definitely can not trust.
One may write it all off as just another step forward on humankind's sad but inevitable journey
towards self-destruction, and just let them carry on with their futile attempts at being in control of
something/anything/nothing until they're done this time around.
With the dedication they show I'm in no doubt they will reach their insane goals one day, and then they'll regret they did and blame someone else – same as always.
In the mean time; have fun … if you can. Laughter makes nonsensical behavior throughout our communities easier to ignore.
last rev: 24.oct.2020