greenhouse climate on demand
… courtesy United Nations et al.
You can have just about any climate change you want any decade you like, at a price of course.
Want the future 3°C warmer‥? Sure, we have that scenario well covered (on computers) by our fine selection of “climate scientists” – the very best and most politically correct, servile and submissive subjects money can buy these days, and we constantly streamline their drafts and conclusions to fit our political agendas.
Oh, you rather want it cooler? Yeah, well, we do of course have that covered in our computer models too – just in case, made easy
by redefining “global warming” to the all-covering “climate change” years ago. Will cost more though, as such
a negative trend isn't actually on our political
wishlist just yet, and covering up previous lies
with new ones tends to cost money – lots of money.
Maybe the price for global cooling will go down slightly next year or the year thereafter, as the previously predicted “warming” trend seems to have fallen flat already. All loose ends should be tidied up and in the right hands pretty soon anyway, so what climate changes that inevitably will follow shouldn't really matter much when it comes to fulfilling the overriding global control agenda for all but the global climate.
Of course the climate is changing … what did you expect‥? Does anyone seriously think climate was static until the UN and IPCC came along? Actually, that “climate has been static until latest decades” message, is what many Climatards are pushing – remember “the IPCC hockey stick”. Shows how ignorant and history-less they are, and/or how stupid they think all others are.
just add more heat, more CO2, and water
Yes, the IPCC is awfully sorry, but … the actual effects of the rising CO2 level on climate have always been difficult to
predict on a global scale once nature itself kicks its (pretty irritating) regulatory mechanisms into gear. Thus, your
greenhouse will need the same supplements of growth factors as before, and most likely more of them since it – according to the
UN – is imperative that we continue to counteract, exploit and tax nature in every way possible.
Those all-important growth factors will of course be made available, at prices dictated by the market forces same as everything else in life.
You may have to double or triple up on CO2 (800 to 1200ppm should do) to make your greenhouse promote growth as needed to feed your designated part of a growing population. In case you wondered: increasing CO2 levels is quite normal in commercial greenhouses. That practice in itself does not increase temperature by a measurable factor, unless a heating-unit is used for releasing CO2. 1
The sun will (hopefully) still provide heat and drive photosynthesis for a billion years or so longer. Should
do for most of us, and (just to put things in perspective) the next ice-ages are expected to hit us a few times
before the sun expands (in both size and temperature) to overheat and finally engulf the earth.2
And, if your greenhouse is small enough just spending plenty time inside “talking to your plants”, may provide enough CO2 from your breath to satisfy the least demanding plants. (The CO2 is about 4% of total exhaled gasses, compared to the about 0.04% CO2 in inhaled air.)
If that doesn't suffice, you may light a wood-fire inside your greenhouse for increased CO2 level in the air – and added heat on cold nights, if you're still allowed to burn wood that is – it may be prohibited and/ or taxed.
No guarantee that water will be available and/ or affordable3 either, as all that wet stuff may end up being under strict market-control – even rain falling on ones own property can be taxed.
on the brighter side
Now, if you're lucky the CO2 levels in air will rise high enough through natural processes – mainly being released from the vast storage in the Earth's oceans, helped by releases of methane from thawing permafrost areas, to solve some of the problems with poor and/or overexploited soil and lack of clean water, as found in many areas around the globe. Reversing desertification here and there most certainly wouldn't hurt a growing population.
Most plantlife does after all need less water and fertilisers for growth and natural spread at somewhat higher CO2 levels – see above, which is the main reason many of us dub CO2 “the gas of life” and do not mind a raise to well above what we have now. Changes are not necessarily a bad thing, and we cannot freeze the Earth and what lives on it to status quo (whatever that is) anyway.
Sorry if that small fact doesn't suit the “real climate deniers”: those who have written off nature's own
capacities and cyclic processes that regulate the factors for life we all rely on on a global scale, as
irrelevant and/or controllable.
Cannot be helped, but hey, they'll get back their snowcaps, glaciers and sea-ice on and off through the same cycles (plural; “cycles”, remember) same as before, all the way to the next ice-age (which no scientist is quite sure when will arrive).
And, no big deal if “real climate deniers” don't believe me. I do not base much in life on beliefs either … I much prefer clearly presented, testable evidence.4
Why write the above that “everyone” knows already?
Well, if one listens to some of those who suggest solutions to all sorts of problems that really should not bother any wise and somewhat educated person in the first place, climate changes caused by rising CO2 levels from burning fossil fuel will run out of control and destroy the world as we know it within years. They have been going on and on about that scenario for decades now…
Thus, we will in their view have to eliminate all manmade CO2 going to the atmosphere (unless we live in places like China, India, Africa, etc, where number of manmade CO2 outlets are allowed to increase), and reinvent ways to live and grow food. All to counteract a disaster that doesn't exist, by creating a whole series of totally unnecessary and 100% manmade disasters affecting millions, if not billions, of people. Stupidity kills!
No use telling the most devoted climate alarmists and others in denial of reality, that what they suggest is futile even if all the world's
countries (for once) managed to agree on something/anything – and they do not!
These people “just know”, and cannot allow for their superior “knowledge” to be disturbed by inconvenient evidence: that the universe continues to be in total control of the overall agenda concerning climate changes and all, regardless of human goals and greed. And the climate will keep on changing. How dare you!
Climatard (image text above spelled out)
A person with no formal education or training in science, who believes that carbon dioxide is a polutant and that the world's climate is being disastrously altered by human emmissions of this vital gas which is essential to life. Favors drastic, unreasonable measures, with no proof they will have any effect and which will cause real, immediate devastation for the poor and middle class. Flies into a rage if you don't agree with them.
Not to worry … the process of “unconfusing” you will start as soon as it is too late for you to do anything about
anything that matters.
In short: you risk being stuck for life in a ditch others have convinced you to dig for yourself, to the degree that you'll even have something that resembles a life if you do not quit paying attention to all you're being told by “experts” – experts on manipulation that is, and their lackeys.
Thus, not much will have changed from the days gone by, not even the weather and the earth's cyclic climate.
History repeats itself, just with different players/suckers at the scenes for each generation, and (in case you wondered) the universe simply does not care one way or the other.
So, grab whatever illusion you like the most while you can, and hold on to it as if your very life depended on it. It probably will…
Another way to put it, is that you will have to sort out and choose what to ignore of all the unrealistic, nonsensical and unimportant information that gets sent your way, if you do not want to end up as more of a mental case with no mind of your own. No-one else will, or can, do it for you without controlling who, and what, you are.
Sometimes ones thoughts are better left hanging loosely in public spaces, instead of being spelled out in minute details.
Maybe I should have followed my own advice somewhat better, but – to be perfectly clear – I am not bothered by any
of the climate change nonsense.5 I am not the one who will have to save “crisis inventors”
and indoctrinated climate extremists from their own foolishness, so they may as well carry on down the
I do feel sorry for all the innocent who will continue to suffer under the ongoing and announced madness, but they are not my responsibility either … shame on me.
But, we have to do something…
Yes, we have to quit listening to, and paying, climate alarmists, and rather start paying attention to, and become, proper environmentalists. Nature runs its course … stop polluting and destroying it.
At the time of writing more pressing global matters occupy my mind and most media outlets, as the spread of the
Corona virus COVID-19 spreads fear, disease and death among people I know, and lots more people I do, or did, not know. All so
Unlike the “climate crisis”, the ongoing pandemic most definitely is not a laughing matter.
Hoping for the best all around, as hoping (and observing isolation regulations) is pretty much all most of us can do these days.
last rev: 10.apr.2020