the lost art of climatology
… 
a climate-profiteer's dream.
As real, fact-based, climatology seems to have fallen totally out of favor over time, and hypothesises,
guesswork, computer generated data and pure lies has taken over for documented and somewhat
verifiable observations, the stage is cleared for climate profiteers of all shapes and sizes to take
over and rewrite the entire play to suit their agendas.
The only actor that is guaranteed to not play along, will be the global climate itself, as money does not impress our old planet
and surrounding universe in that respect. Not that “such a small matter” matters much to those who stand
to profit the most from the various “climate-saving” and “population control” schemes.
Following the ongoing United Nations COP26 summit in Glasgow* in various media, is not worth any intelligent being's time.
The old tune: “Nothing was delivered”, comes to mind from the very beginning.
Not even the many dignitaries present in Glasgow seemed to be able to show much enthusiasm for what
flowed from the mouths of various speakers in the initial rounds.
Quite understandable…
Whatever alarmists claim and politicians decide: Earth's climate will continue to change as it
cycles through the complex mix of known* and as-of-yet unknown or not well documented phases,
cycles and events based primarily on its position and relations to the sun and the other planets and heavenly bodies in the near
universe*, with next to zero concern for what we humans get done or leave undone in this field.
Conclusion: no cause for alarm*.
protect our local environments
While all sorts of environmental destruction* is being allowed by
the authorities, “because … climate”, not much is done to shield and improve the
lives of commoners and others of God's creatures in the areas most exposed to such man-made destruction. Thus, the more
posing, talking, writing and action that is focused on and around the nonsensical task of
controlling the Earth's climate via CO2 reduction(sic), the worse
conditions will become for everyone living everywhere.
That is; except for the scamsters who of course make sure to stay well outside of it all, where they can watch the
destruction taking place and profit from it, without being personally affected. That is part of the
big scam, and the destruction will continue for as long as someone thinks there is money and power to be had on it,
and they can find politicians and other climate-obsessed and green-painted fools willing to subsidize the
madness*.
Can sometimes be difficult from the outside to see who are only in it for the money and power, and who actually are afraid that the world may end in a CO2 driven climate-disaster. That the former group of people induce fear in the latter group in order to control them and the money-flow, is in my opinion the worst part of the entire “save the world from climate change” scam. It's a shame…
Climate changes are all right. Scamsters, cheaters and liars that profit from them not so much.
Would be so much better if we who actually care and still have functioning minds, focused major parts of our combined mental capacities on understanding as much as we humanly can about how it all works*, and on figuring out how best to live and play along with these natural changes locally, rather than pouring money into schemes pretending to prevent climate changes on global levels, as the latter is doomed to fail its “intended” purpose no matter how much of our money that gets wasted on lining the pockets of the world's main scammers and profiteers.
yes, we can…
As individuals and small groups we are capable of doing a lot in, and to, our local environments – including
affect the local climate quite a bit if we want and need to, and we may as well improve the areas where we live for ourselves and
the beings we share them with, when, and as, we find necessary. Modifying nature to provide us with the amounts and quality of
food, shelters and space we need, do not have to be justified. All living beings, including plants, do it.
However, if we modify everything that is not man-made everywhere, all will be lost and can never be restored to its former,
natural, state. Having nice pictures and scale models in museums of what once was, is not quite the same as having the real works of art in
and around our neighborhoods … Munch et al do not measure up
to much in comparison.
text in image: "Wilderness is not a luxury but a necessity. The idea of wilderness needs no
defence, it only needs defenders."
— Edward Abbey
That some humans are unable to look at untouched nature without seeing dollar signs and calculating potential profit*, should not affect the more intelligent among us. There are other and much greater values than money all around us, and we should protect these values as if our very lives depended on them, because in reality they do.
By not destroying our environments “just because we can”, much is gained. By choosing the least invasive and destructive solutions and methods when we have no choice but to exploit and/or modify our natural environment in order to progress, even more can be gained. We simply have to pause and think things over, before setting out to destroy the irreplaceable. There is no going back if we get it wrong.
The scamsters and profiteers will of course not sit still and allow us commoners to think and act sensible on our own and not allow them to control us in every respect. They have too much to lose, and will do all it takes to stay in control.
know what to ignore
In order to succeed with anything here on Earth, one must know what, and thereby who, to ignore. That is easiest when you
know what you want, and why, so better start there.
As most of us just want to live quiet lives without having the prospect of any serious crises hanging over us, I use that as
basis in the following.
One way forward is to let others – our elected and unelected “masters” or whoever they delegate positions and tasks to – control everything in life. In which case you do not have to do anything but shut up, pay up, and leave all major decisions to these “others”. Should be easy enough from the sound of it, but no use having a mind of your own about anything that matters.
A second alternative is to weigh everything, and everyone, based on their values. Which means you will have to sort out, and keep on resorting, your own values and views on everything and everyone around you. Over time the process leading to total independency becomes easier and easier as you gather knowledge*, but it may not bring you many friends among those who chose the alternative above.
A third alternative is to pretend to choose the first alternative, while keeping your mouth shut and actually follow the second. A little secrecy does not hurt – just look at how scamsters, politicians and other profiteers hide their real intentions. You do not have to reveal, or justify to anyone, what happens to be on your mind at any given time.
What these alternatives have to do with climatology* may elude
many, as it requires flexible and unrestricted minds, and the will to use them to find answers.
No wonder those who already have delegated just about everything else that affect their lives over to “higher
powers”, also buy the official version(s)* about climatic processes
without questioning them. Knowledge and verifiable data do not seem to fit their chosen profile…
As one who has a habit of questioning everything anyway, there is no way I will ever stop questioning the official and politically sanctioned sources, and search for more accurate ones. As actual facts that keep on surfacing* seem to contradict most of the official lines as they are presented to us, I will keep on digging for more facts.
(14.nov.2021) As for the COP26* * : it seems to have ended about as close to a FLOP26 as it could get while still allowing some of the delegates to brag about the result. Interpret that as you like…
Who says what does not matter much to me, while what gets said by whoever most
definitely does. One can never collect too many facts, or eliminate too much false and flawed information.
And, yes, I do include, and listen to, arguments from all sides*. Only time, and quality of
those messages, set limits for how much.
sincerely 
Hageland 06.nov.2021
last rev: 27.feb.2022