… for all pseudoscientists.
The UN/IPCC's order of the day is that manmade (anthropogenic) CO2 releases to the
atmosphere are out of control and have to be stopped immediately in order to save the planet, unless we live in places like China, India, Africa, etc, where increased manmade CO2 releases
apparently have no negative effects.
The above says it all, really, but let us not disappoint the most eager climate alarmists by pointing out how totally pointless and stupid the many climate consensuses and solutions they are pointing to are, just yet.
It is all so clear to the pseudoscientists' political masters and their business partners, that if they can make everyone within reach buy (or at least accept) their excellent logic and not stirr up things and constantly try to ridicule and destroy the multitude of imperfect computer models their perfect plans appear to be based on, the future would be so bright … for the few survivors.
Pity the pseudoscientists who have had to formulate new climate predictions every time the old
ones failed, even those carefully crafted to cover all eventualities.
Especially irritating now that politicians and business people have decided that… “the SCIENCE is SETTLED” … and all that1.
Systematised mind-control and scare-tactics with no base in the reality they claim to know so much about, and no-one behind the claims willing to accept discussions related to any of it. Getting suspicious now?
It is indeed getting harder and harder with time to get even the very latest and most carefully crafted
computer models to line up with anything in the real world2. Earth-climate is simply too complex to fit the chosen modelling techniques, and also seemingly refuse to play
along with the UN/IPCC pseudoscience and many, often contradictory, political
Rewriting climate history also only get them so far, and then only on paper since the real climate doesn't bother to correct for either group's intentions and/or fantasies no matter how much effort they put into formulation of slick lies and downplaying of the missing data and many “calculation errors”.
Maybe we non-pseudoscientists should lend the UN/IPCC a helping hand, and cook up some implausibly simple climate correlations entirely for free. Let us see now…
• Global sea level rise started around 1860, well before fossil carbon emmisions became significant.
• Steep increase in CO2 emmisions 1950 - 1980 is associated with very little sea rise.
As the beginning of the latest somewhat steep rise of CO2 level corresponds closely with the birth of this author, that I am guilty of causing that rise is as good and fanta-logical an explanation as any, with the latest trends of pseudoscience.
That this author then also must have been holding back and reduced the global sea level rise my entire life, is of course just as
Consequently: this author is the master of nature, if only in his own fantasies.
The above shows how easy correlations to back up ones claims – whatever they are – can be made
up, if one doesn't give a damn about sequences and details contained in those data that is, and also choose to ignore that nearly all
that matters to get a complete picture of reality is left out.
Good thing I did not write this article for climatards to read, as I doubt they understand much that doesn't fit their mental and computerised models.
What the graphs above do indicate quite clearly, is that there is no meaningful correlation between sea level rise and global CO2 level rise in that timeframe.
You immediately caught that basic correlation fallacy below, I guess. However, if I had added some smoke and mirrors, and comments about CO2, and re-named the nonsense: “settled climate correlation”, I bet the most devoted climatards would have swallowed it hook, line and sinker.
One can find a corrolation between the age of Miss America from year 1999 and several years upwards, and the number of murders by steam, hot vapors and hot objects in same timeframe.
Perfect for wannabee pseudoscientists with too much time on their hands, but not much else. Typical logical fallacy.
Not unlike how some may be expected to fall into the trap if I modified the figure to the right of here a little. I chose not
to in case a climatard passed by and didn't quite get the figure above. Must not make it too hard for them.
It is a fact that very few people check the quality of the data they are presented with, only who is presenting it. So, if someone is enough of an authority and/or celebrity in the receivers' eyes, he/she can get away with anything – including murder – based on totally worthless data.
Pseudoscience promoters may have it anyway they want for all I care, as with their superior insight and infallible knowledge they most likely will end up killing themselves and their own lackeys in order to make either one of their many versions of indisputable truth win the majority of minds by brute force.
I am quite content with how the universe works its magic all over our Earth, with mostly natural and (from
a human perspective) uncontrollable climate changes, spiced with a pretty limited factor of
interference created by mankind.
Eliminate the alarmism and related “green” madness, and its all good7.
nature is in charge
So let us give the climate alarmists what they want: an actual correlation of CO2 vs. temperature in
a geological perspective…
Sorry alarmists, but you can not “adjust” or remove data from the past just because they do not suit you or some master plan. You are here now because of much higher CO2 levels in the past, and you will continue to be here because the CO2 level luckily hasn't gone too low to sustain life, yet. Now, correlate that with your severly limited computer models.
I am never quite sure if the right reaction to climate alarmists' many claims and attempts to throw non-conformant people
off with their “flat earth” jokes, is to laugh, get mad, or just get sad. Thus, I rarely ever bother getting either, and
rather (literally) write it all off as just another set of climatard-stupidity and forget about it.
However else can any sensible and thinking individual6 react to all that nonsensical stuff that is being uttered and sputtered by seemingly somewhat intelligent people?
I do hope more of the climate-worried people come to their senses, before they become more or less ignorant participants in
one of the eradication squads that aim to remove what little order we have on Earth, and kill off humanity in order to
“save the planet” for the few4.
There has been enough of that kind of people already in our recent history, and we do not need more Hitler, Himmler, Goebbels, Stalin, or Pol Pot wannabees, or minions to same, on the global scene than we already have … regardless of “good intentions” and all that.
oh so boring
Yes, I admit to being more than a little bit bored while writing this somewhat climate related article. Not sure if it is the subject – boring enough in itself, or the social distancing we observe at present – corona virus and all that, that has such an effect on me. Maybe a bit of both.
That boredom is a great driving force for creative minds, is old knowledge that most seem to either not have learned, have forgotten about, or are afraid of. A pity that particular force isn't utilised more in our world of constant entertainment and unrelenting demands for instant gratification.
Whatever, I'm feeling OK now, despite not being sure how that correlates to what I have written. Time to stop punishing the keyboard though, for now.
last rev: 16.apr.2020